Butte College and Rebuilding Communities

I spent the past two days on the Butte College campus in Oroville, California. It is a mid-sized community college of roughly 7500 students situated just south of Chico in Northern California. The campus rests on a wildlife refuge, and has been recognized as a national community college leader in sustainability, winning the grand prize 2008 National Wildlife Federation's Chill Out Contest and the 2009 National Campus Sustainability Leadership Award. It is a stunning and serene setting to bring together students from the throughout the region for training in applied learning programs.

But, you might know the region from the Camp Fire, the wildfire that burned in November 2018. The Camp Fire was the deadliest and most destructive wildfire in California's history and the most expensive natural disaster in the world in 2018 in terms of insured losses. It completely burned down multiple communities, destroying towns such as Paradise, California.

I am amazed by the resilience demonstrated by people in this community. Environmental disruption has been their recent five year history, from the Camp Fire to the pandemic, as the region tries to rebuild and reemerge stronger. Throughout Butte County, you see commemorations to the destruction around this time of year. And, community colleges such as Butte College are an integral part of that rebuilding process. Situated in the heart of the county, Butte College is among the most integral components of workforce development, creating career pathways in areas such as law enforcement, fire fighting, healthcare professionals that literally rebuild the region. I’m feeling grateful and inspired today after watching this resilient organization literally lift and elevate a community.

The Fallacy of Dualistic (Either/Or) Thinking

Why is it that we get stuck in a fallacy of dualistic thinking in the education sector? I have come to believe it is one of the most prevalent thinking challenges that plagues the education sector. It unnecessarily hinders progress and creates roadblocks to change in school and college cultures. Let me explain.

Just what is dualistic thinking? It is the type of binary thinking that promotes a singular position as an answer to a complex challenge. Some examples in education include topics such as educational identity (progressive or traditional) or academics (rigor or flexible) or modality (in person or online). These binary choices promote a false singular narrative and challenge us to believe that we have to be in either one camp or the other. And, what’s worse, is that they often create an oppositional view of the alternate choice, creating sort of a villain out of that choice.

The truth is - and has always been - that complex problems require a variety of well-designed solutions. There is rarely a one-size-fits-all solution to a complex problem. For example, consider the modality of learning. As educators, we know that certain disciplines promote stronger learning outcomes when taught in person, while others are more natural to be delivered online. And, not only should that be OK, but it should be celebrated that an educational institution can be flexible and adaptable to meet the needs of different learner profiles.

We have a lot to learn as educators about the cultural issues that emerge as roadblocks for change. In our experience, dualistic thinking looms as among the largest in this category. After all of the lessons the last 36 months have taught us in this industry, perhaps we have learned that we can be more creative, adaptable and have more flexible solutions to complex problems.

Does Independence Breed Innovation or Insularity?

I have often believed that the great asset of an independent school, college or university is held in their categorical name: independent. In fact, one might expect independent private schools and colleges to drive the most substantial change and emerge with the greatest advances in the education sector. They are independent, beholden to no one except their mission and stakeholders. As I said in our blog yesterday:

An independent school or college is defined by their ability to make their own choices, chose their own mission, and cultivate their own, self-perpetuating board members. In other words, these are organizations that have few limitations, other than those they impose on themselves.

I have come to believe, however, that independence can often be a breeding ground for two different ends of the spectrum. On the one hand, we do witness a small set of institutions that truly define innovation. They create the advances that drive our industry, whether it be in curriculum design, learning research, educational delivery or public purpose. They lead and others follow, sometimes reluctantly.

Experience has also taught me that independence also breeds insularity. Our industry sector - private, independent schools and colleges - often find themselves in a distinct category in their marketplaces. Or, at least they believe they are in a distinct category. They have a tendency to believe that what they do is actually unique to them, innovative to the core, and precious to the market. And, to be completely honest, it is not. Most of what they are doing is similar to many other schools and colleges. This inward thinking often drives resistance to change and, at the very core, a real limitation on their innovation.

I have often believed that independence is the most valuable asset of these organizations. Harnessing it to advance learning in a new world seems to me the task of the moment. Getting out of their own way is the primary challenge for many of these same schools and colleges.